Amily called for supplementation
The officials below were entrusted with the duty eliciting this explanation
Leave it to me to have asked what is, as you pointed out the pitfall. The question, namely why, if I'm Orange and to alter motives, was it necessary for the agent of the syndicate in London to write him a letter of the same UK 1806 the Robins, informing treasury as regards the complaints of clinker hut and to Im Orange.
This cuts a sorry figure to find that The Colonial Office apparently appreciated urgently the imperfection of her being in association with this syndicate and acted promptly in calling on Im to sever it. I think that the answer of this despatch might begin with a reference herein, and might proceed to point out that the Lordy's state committee regard the result of the enquiry as conclusive until the Im King's letter of the 30th July last has here supplemented and the affirmation of every which it joins bringing connection onto the syndicate accounted for.
It seems to me that the Evidence and Im Price's letter of the said date established beyond doubt the fact that the syndicate had the question of difficulties much to the Government here strongly in view; and further I think that Im Price's statement in that letter that Tim Ansur on Grange on this point must have satisfied him that the
Page 387
(No further changes made as the "Page 387" appears to be a page numbering metadata)
Amily called for suplemnation
·
The efficials behom was enkeerted the duty eliciting this explionation
Leem to me to have auslasked what
is, as cue
pointed aut
the pittoo The question, waneel why, if I'm Ormge
And to alter motives, was it
breechay for the agent of the lyndi sete in London burite him litter of the
soby uk
1806 the Robins,
Inforing leeresy as
regards the
Commples of clinker hut and to
Im Orange.
This cuts factory to find that The Colmial for ? appreciated ergibly the imprefect of her bengis sadaciation with this byndicate and ceted fromptly in calling
Im to sever it. Ithink that
m
the answer of this despatch might legin
with
387
a refeisure bohin, and might praceed
а
to print out that the Leed y state commit regard the result of the Enguing as conclusive tankil the Im King's letter of the 306
If July last has her suplemed and the affeemme of levery
which it joins
Bhu
bromgin commection onto the lyndicate arcombed
Fr.
It seems to me that the Evidone and
Im Price's letter of the bed bunuh Artablich byond doubt the fact that the byndicatio Lad the question of dufflers comuch to
the
le fovernment here thingly in view; and authier fint Tels out think that Im Prices statment in thed letter that Tim Ansuur om Grange an this promat Must have batisfied him that the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.